• Contact
  • About
  • ISSN 3049-9712
  • Authors and editors
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
Bylines Cymru
Advertisement
  • Home
  • Politics & Society
    • Devolution
    • Economy
    • Education
    • Europe
    • Health
    • Housing
    • Media
    • Trade
    • Westminster
  • Arts & Culture
  • Hiraeth
  • Voices
    • Deialog | Interview
    • Editorial
    • Gwalia | History
    • Opinion
    • Poetry
  • Sports
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Politics & Society
    • Devolution
    • Economy
    • Education
    • Europe
    • Health
    • Housing
    • Media
    • Trade
    • Westminster
  • Arts & Culture
  • Hiraeth
  • Voices
    • Deialog | Interview
    • Editorial
    • Gwalia | History
    • Opinion
    • Poetry
  • Sports
No Result
View All Result
Bylines Cymru
Home Politics & Society

Can Britain still call itself a full democracy?

Britain is no longer watching democratic decline from afar. V-Dem’s 2026 Democracy Report warns the danger is now closer to home

Robert G Davies by Robert G Davies
27-05-2026 12:02 - Updated on 28-05-2026 09:29
in Politics & Society, Voices | Lleisiau
Reading Time: 7 mins read
A A
Typewriter with a sheet of paper stating 'Freedom of Speech'

image by Markus Winkler. Used with permission

Share on Bluesky

This article was driven by the sense that questions of power and democratic voice are no longer abstract. The warning signs in UK public life are mounting: media power concentrated in a few hands and politics ever more vulnerable to unaccountable money; pressure on electoral safeguards, from voter access to the independence of bodies such as the Electoral Commission; and a growing willingness to curb protest while putting added strain on the rule of law and judicial independence. Here we set those warning signs against empirical findings of democratic decline and institutional erosion.

Democracy’s long slide

This is not a short-term setback but a deeper reversal. Based at the University of Gothenburg, the V-Dem Institute runs one of the world’s largest democracy research projects, tracking elections, civil liberties, media freedom, judicial independence and the rule of law across more than 200 countries and territories.

The figures are stark. There are now more autocracies than democracies in the world: 92 authoritarian regimes compared with 87 democratic ones. Around three quarters of the world’s population, about six billion people, live under autocratic rule, while only a small minority live in full liberal democracies. Democracy is no longer the dominant global system; it is becoming the exception.

The decline is accelerating

What makes this moment different is not only the scale of the decline but how widely it is spreading. V-Dem calls it a ‘third wave of autocratisation’: a reversal on the scale of the democratic gains of the late twentieth century but moving in the opposite direction. Today, 44 countries are becoming more autocratic while only 18 are becoming more democratic.

This wave is especially dangerous because it now reaches large and economically powerful states. When democratic backsliding spreads to influential economies, it can shift not only domestic politics but the wider balance of global power.

Hungary and the mechanics of decline

Hungary offers a clear example of how democratic decline works in practice. Drawing on reporting by James Bloodworth in Byline Times, the lesson is not a dramatic break with democracy but its methodical hollowing out through legal change, institutional control and media capture.

“The former Prime Minister did not destroy democracy outright, he re-engineered it into a system in which elections continue but meaningful political competition does not.”

James Bloodworth, Byline Times

V-Dem now classifies Hungary as an electoral autocracy rather than a flawed liberal democracy, pointing to long-term damage in media freedom, judicial independence, clean elections and institutional checks. During Viktor Orbán’s years in power, the state was reshaped so that losing office would not necessarily mean losing control.

The process was legalistic rather than dramatic: rules were rewritten, watchdog roles filled with loyalists, electoral arrangements repeatedly altered and public institutions reshaped to protect those in power. Media capture and crony capitalism completed what V-Dem describes as gradual institutional capture; a reminder that systems hollowed out slowly are far harder to rebuild than to win.

Photo by Ed Callaghan Used with permission

Britain’s drift

Hungary is an extreme case. The UK is not there yet. But V-Dem’s Democracy Report 2026 argues that Britain is no longer outside the same broader pattern. It identifies the UK as one of ten new countries showing signs of autocratisation in 2025: not a country that has suddenly collapsed but one that has begun to drift in the wrong direction.

That matters because this is how democracies are often weakened now: not by tanks in the streets but by the slow wearing away of safeguards. V-Dem points to weakening in freedom of expression, the media environment, limits on executive power and the wider quality of liberal democracy. Elections still take place but the conditions that make them truly fair and corrective can weaken year by year.

“Freedom of Expression, a core aspect of democracy, shows the most drastic global decline, and is the most common target among autocratising leaders over the past 25 years.”

Staffan I Lindberg V-Dem

Transparency International (TI) reinforces the picture. In its 2025 Corruption Perceptions Index, the UK scored 70 out of 100 and ranked 20th in the world; its lowest score since 2012. TI points to the influence of big money in politics, repeated scandals, weak enforcement and the UK’s role as a hub for illicit or “dirty” money moving through property, company structures and weak anti-money-laundering controls.

“Unless we act decisively to tackle the corrupting influence of big money in politics and strengthen anti-corruption frameworks, these concerns will become the new normal.”

Daniel Bruce, Transparency International UK.

None of this means the UK is becoming an autocracy like Hungary. But it does suggest a gradual weakening of standards, safeguards and trust. Britain is no longer outside the story of democratic decline; it is part of it.

When the West loses credibility

Western democracies long saw themselves as democracy’s anchor: the states that set the standard and defended the rules. V-Dem’s findings suggest that claim now carries less weight. The West remains influential but it is less credible.

The consequences are not confined to national politics. When large states move away from accountable government, institutions become harder to trust, alliances more fragile and diplomacy less rooted in rules than in leverage. As democratic norms weaken, international cooperation becomes more selective, more transactional and less capable of restraint.

The costs are not abstract. At home, autocratisation narrows dissent and weakens civil society. Abroad, it raises the risk of miscalculation just as the world faces crises: climate breakdown, displacement, economic shocks and war that cannot be managed by raw power alone. A world governed less by shared rules and more by force is a more dangerous one.

The most unsettling conclusion of the Democracy Report 2026 is this: democratic decline is no longer a distant problem. It is accelerating inside established democracies. Whether Britain can still call itself a full democracy will depend not on its history but on its willingness to defend democratic standards now.


More from Robert G Davies

Rishi Sunak lives in another world with his money while the world burns. Art by Plebo
Politics & Society

Public funding of political parties: transparency for democracy

by Simon Hobson
23 March 2024

Bylines Network Gazette is out!

The latest Bylines Network Gazette is out now. Become a Friend of Bylines Network or upgrade to a paid Substack subscription, and you will get access to a vital collection of citizen articles and stories.

Journalism by the people, for the people.

Previous Post

Brexit: a bird-brained coup has ruffled more than feathers

Next Post

How SLAPPs and libel law continue to chill investigative reporting in Britain

Robert G Davies

Robert G Davies

Born and raised in the "ugly, lovely town" of Swansea. A sociologist who moved into lecturing in the further and higher education sector, after initially working in social research. Then it was management, primarily related to student services and partnership building, particularly with overseas partners in China, India and the Middle East. In the late 2000s he established his own international business development company, specialising in education and sport. Alongside work, he was an international rugby referee. He is involved with several charitable organisations, enjoys music, travel and belongs to several singing groups. He is married to Andrea and lives in Dunvant, Swansea. A proud father and bampa.

Related Posts

3 women and 1 man standing outside 10 Downing Street.
Politics & Society

Campaigners urge broadcasters to wake up to voting reform

by Samuel James Jackson
10 September 2026
A large sign in front of a fence.
Economy

Holyhead’s empty Brexit border post exposes the price of Brexit red tape

by Joe McDonald
8 September 2026
5 males standing outside HM treasury building.
Politics & Society

Steel, sacrifice and a 24-year fight for pension justice

by Mark Thomas
6 September 2026
Dirty Sewage is drained into natural public pond.
Environment

A river stripped of life: inside the Kenfig sewage disaster

by Maggie Curley
2 September 2026 - Updated on 7 September 2026
Fibre optic cables in network switch.
Politics & Society

Can Wales shape the AI revolution before it reshapes Wales?

by Martha Garcia
27 August 2026 - Updated on 28 August 2026
Next Post
Journalist holding a megaphone which emits the speech bubble 'Truth'

How SLAPPs and libel law continue to chill investigative reporting in Britain

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

BROWSE BY TAGS

austerity Austerity Project Brexit campaign climate change community Cost of living Covid Cymraeg democracy devolution economy education energy environment equality events general election health history identity inclusion independence international journalism mental health older people opinion party politics Plaid Cymru Poetry Sunday politics public health public services research Senedd South Wales Welsh culture Welsh Government Welsh heritage Welsh history Welsh language Welsh poetry Welsh writers Westminster
Bylines Cymru

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in Cymru and beyond.

Bylines Cymru is a trading brand of Bylines Networks Limited which is separate to, but allied with, Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors and editors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Privacy
  • Network Map
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Download the Bylines Network App

© 2023-2026 Bylines Cymru. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9712

No Result
View All Result
  • Politics & Society
    • Devolution
    • Economy
    • Education
    • Health
    • Housing
    • Media
    • Trade
    • Westminster
  • Arts & Culture
  • Hiraeth
  • Voices | Lleisiau
    • Deialog | Interview
    • Editorial
    • Gwalia | History
    • Opinion
    • Poetry
  • Sports & Leisure

Newsletter sign up

CROWDFUNDER

© 2023-2026 Bylines Cymru. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9712