• Contact
  • About
DONATE TO BYLINES CYMRU
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
  • Login
Bylines Cymru
  • Home
  • Politics & Society
    • Devolution
    • Economy
    • Education
    • Europe
    • Health
    • Housing
    • Media
    • Trade
    • Westminster
  • Arts & Culture
  • Hiraeth
  • Voices
    • Deialog | Interview
    • Editorial
    • Gwalia | History
    • Opinion
    • Poetry
  • Sports
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Politics & Society
    • Devolution
    • Economy
    • Education
    • Europe
    • Health
    • Housing
    • Media
    • Trade
    • Westminster
  • Arts & Culture
  • Hiraeth
  • Voices
    • Deialog | Interview
    • Editorial
    • Gwalia | History
    • Opinion
    • Poetry
  • Sports
No Result
View All Result
Bylines Cymru
Home Politics & Society

King Charles’s coronation: what impartial broadcast coverage of the event would look like

With republican protesters being arrested before they can even hoist a placard, how likely is it that coronation coverage will be impartial?

Stephen CushionbyStephen Cushion
06-05-2023 12:11
in Politics & Society
Reading Time: 8 mins read
A A
Charles and Camilla by Plebo

Charles and Camilla by Plebo

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

King Charles III’s coronation will be broadcast to millions of people around the world. Many of those viewers will be watching on the BBC, whose impartiality when it comes to the monarchy has come under question.

The campaign group Republic recently sent a letter to the public broadcaster stating that the BBC “not only fails to be impartial, but makes no attempt to be impartial or balanced and, most shockingly, openly colludes with the palace in its coverage”.

Due impartiality

Broadcasters have long been criticised about their coverage of politics and public affairs. Unlike newspapers, online news, and social media, broadcasters are regulated by Ofcom and have to abide by rules on impartiality.

Ofcom’s code asks broadcasters to follow “due impartiality” guidelines. Being impartial means not favouring one side over another. But, as my research has shown, the “due” gives broadcasters plenty of leeway in how they construct impartiality and select competing perspectives.

Ofcom’s guidance emphasises broadcasters’s rights of freedom of expression. But it asks for news items to “take account of all relevant facts, including the nature of the coverage and whether there are varying viewpoints on a particular item”. The regulator also points out that any topic – not just political controversy or public policy – is potentially subject to impartiality.

The BBC claims to report impartially on the royal family. Over recent years, there have been times when broadcasters have reported critically on royal figures.

Covering the crown

The now-infamous Newsnight interview, in which Prince Andrew discussed his alleged sexual exploits, lavish lifestyle, and friendship with sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, was widely reported by broadcasters, as was his subsequent withdrawal from public life.

In a Netflix series, Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, reflected on her experiences of racism inside Buckingham Palace. While Netflix is not subject to Ofcom regulation, many broadcasters followed up on the interviews. Some, including the BBC, reported on Prince Harry’s suggestion that an “invisible contract” existed between the royal family and reporters. This gave credence to claims that journalists trade inside access for less serious scrutiny of the monarchy.

The BBC has also faced criticism from viewers who see the broadcaster as not being appropriately respectful in royal coverage. A notable example was the controversy over newscaster Peter Sisson’s burgundy tie when he announced the queen mother’s death in 2002. When BBC news anchor Huw Edwards announced the passing of Queen Elizabeth II in 2022, he was praised for his sombre and emotional demeanour – while wearing all black attire.

When broadcasters reported the queen’s funeral, a sombre tone of public mourning shaped coverage. This “national mood” was represented in interviews with members of the public paying testament to the queen’s long reign and praising the monarchy more generally. But while broadcasters understandably adopted a respectful tone about the royalty during the queen’s funeral, how accurately does this represent public opinion about the monarchy?

In 1994 the British Social Attitudes (BSA) survey revealed that two-thirds of the public – 67% on average – agreed “it is important for Britain to continue to have a monarchy”. By 2021, this had slipped to 55% – the lowest score on record – with one-quarter believing either the monarchy was “not at all important” or that it should be abolished.

Far fewer younger people considered the monarchy to be very important, but the BSA survey suggests that support tends to grow as people age. A new YouGov poll commissioned by the BBC has assessed public perception of the monarchy in the weeks before the coronation. While showing broad support for the monarchy, it also revealed the youngest age group favour replacing the monarchy with an elected head of state. This reinforces a similar poll taken by YouGov in 2021.

Impartiality in coronation coverage

In day-to-day reporting, my studies of television news have shown the monarchy does not typically make up much coverage. Beyond dramatic scandals involving royal figures, it tends to be the pomp and ceremony of major events, such as the late queen’s death and funeral, that pushes the monarchy up the news agenda.

When focused on these events, broadcast coverage can often imply that the UK is united behind the monarchy – but the evidence suggests this is not a full picture of public opinion. Many people hold republican perspectives, and a significant minority of the public hold critical viewpoints about the monarchy.

But based on the special programming broadcasters have announced they intend to air during the coronation, it does not look likely that these perspectives will be prominently reflected. The schedules of the major broadcasters will largely follow royal events and ceremonies. Only Channel 4 appears to include programming that raises critical questions about the UK’s constitutional arrangements. The comedian Frankie Boyle considered whether the monarchy is out of touch in modern Britain, while the journalist Emily Maitlis reflected on that controversial 2019 interview with Prince Andrew that had devastating implications for the royal family.


Should other broadcasters be following Channel 4’s lead? Ofcom’s rules on impartiality ask for “varying viewpoints on a particular item”. Whether in routine news reporting or in one-off programming about the royalty, broadcasters could do more to reflect the public’s perspectives.

In practice, royal correspondents could adopt a more critical and detached standpoint by challenging rather than largely accepting perspectives they source from Buckingham Palace. Meanwhile, debates about the pros and cons of a constitutional monarchy could be a more regular part of coverage. News bulletins, for example, could feature interviews with the public that include republican as well as royalist voices.

An impartial approach to covering the coronation would include broadcasters not only reporting the pomp, circumstance, and bank holiday celebrations – it would also feature perspectives that question the existence and role of the monarchy.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.


We need your help!

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication, but we still have considerable costs.

If you believe in what we do, please consider subscribing to our digital Bylines Gazette from as little as £2 a month 🙏

Tags: mediamonarchypressregulation
Previous Post

The unwelcome politicisation of a Wales Covid inquiry

Next Post

How a local community helped make incredible prehistoric discoveries

Stephen Cushion

Stephen Cushion

Dr Stephen Cushion is a professor at the Cardiff University School of Journalism, Media, and Culture. He is the Director of Research Development and Environment there, and is on the senior management team. Follow the website link for an extensive list of his research work and publications.

Related Posts

Senedd Siambr / Chamber
Politics & Society

Empowering Welsh democracy: the Senedd Cymru (Members and Elections) Bill explained

byFarrell Perks
25 September 2023
Illustration of King Charles
Politics & Society

Heavy is the head: the Crown as Schrödinger’s Hat

byRachel Morris
21 September 2023
Euronwydd Godwin using handrails installed at her home following a serious fall
Politics & Society

Children can play a vital role in helping older people reduce their risk of falls

byAge Cymru
19 September 2023
Fraud funds terrorism in the UK: image of a sinister masked plastic figure at a computer
Politics & Society

Terrorists are using fraud to fund their activities – the UK government needs to act urgently

byNicholas Ryder
18 September 2023
Slowed rainy day traffic
Politics & Society

Welsh Conservatives and 20mph: are they woke postmodernists?

byNeil Schofield-Hughes
18 September 2023
Next Post
Local community members work at the Caerau hillfort archaeological dig in South Wales

How a local community helped make incredible prehistoric discoveries

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

Subscribe to our newsletters
CHOOSE YOUR NEWS
Follow us on social media
CHOOSE YOUR PLATFORMS
Download our app
ALL OF BYLINES IN ONE PLACE
Subscribe to our gazette
CONTRIBUTE TO OUR SUSTAINABILITY
Make a monthly or one-off donation
DONATE NOW
Help us with our hosting costs
SIGN UP TO SITEGROUND
We are always looking for citizen journalists
WRITE FOR US
Volunteer as an editor, in a technical role, or on social media
VOLUNTEER FOR US
Something else?
GET IN TOUCH
Previous slide
Next slide

LATEST

Buckingham Palace guard

The Diary of a Secret Royal: dodgy dispatches from a sly and funny fellow

28 September 2023
New mum and baby

When being a new mum feels overwhelming: expert advice on what you need to know

26 September 2023
Senedd Siambr / Chamber

Empowering Welsh democracy: the Senedd Cymru (Members and Elections) Bill explained

25 September 2023
Owain Glyndŵr’s banner

Welsh Poetry Sunday: great men of Wales

24 September 2023

MOST READ

No Content Available

BROWSE BY TAGS

accountability austerity Brexit campaign citizen journalism climate change community Cost of living Covid Cymraeg democracy devolution economy education environment EU Europe events film history freeports health history identity inclusion independence journalism Language mental health monarchy poetry Poetry Sunday politics poverty psychology public health public services refugees Refugee Week sustainability Welsh Welsh Government Welsh history Welsh poetry Westminster YesCymru
Bylines Cymru

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in Cymru and beyond.

Bylines Cymru is a trading brand of Bylines Network Limited, which is a partner organisation to Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Network Map
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Privacy

© 2023 Bylines Cymru. Powerful Citizen Journalism

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Politics & Society
    • Devolution
    • Economy
    • Education
    • Health
    • Housing
    • Media
    • Trade
    • Westminster
  • Arts & Culture
  • Hiraeth
  • Voices | Lleisiau
    • Deialog | Interview
    • Editorial
    • Gwalia | History
    • Opinion
    • Poetry
  • Sports & Leisure
  • Newsletter sign up
  • Authors
CROWDFUNDER

© 2023 Bylines Cymru. Powerful Citizen Journalism

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In